Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Leon Adato's avatar

IM(ns)HO there's no comparison. The original is... original. It's engaging. It uses specific real-world examples and predicts not only outcomes but also the reader's questions.

The generated text is - both objectively and by comparison - bland, repetitive, and lacks any meaningful insight or actionable advice.

I think (and have blogged about - I'll be gauche enough to mention my post, but not so gauche as to link to it here) ChatGPT has a place, and will certainly improve in quality over time. But I also think that trying to get it to "replace" is the wrong goal. The question (I believe) is how we can get ChatGPT and other AI tools can assist or augment.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts